Author: Evans Woherem, PhD
Version: 1.0
Date: 2025
Abstract
Terrorism, banditry, and criminal violence have become so commonplace today that it has become part of daily conversations in the country. Daily, there are all manner of news about terror attacks in largely the North-East, North-West, and North-Central parts of the country, as well as news about kidnappings, abductions, banditry, and criminal violence. Despite promises made by every incoming government administration, the story remains the same or even worse. This has been the case since 2009. It has become more commonplace, widespread, and are now being felt even in the southern parts of the country.
This paper proposes a comprehensive strategy for ending all the above forms of insecurity in the country. It is pragmatic, implementable, cost-effective, and realistic. It focuses largely on intelligence-led, new policing architecture, disruption of the financial routes of the operators, regional cooperation, tough measures on criminality and corruption, and governance reformulation. It proposes that the country must be very intentional, willing, and highly coordinated in approach, as well as ensuring that the whole government and the whole of society are involved. It is only by doing so that the country can have a sustainable solution to the high levels of insecurity in the country.
- Introduction: A Nation Under a Prolonged Siege
The primary responsibility of safeguarding the life and property of citizens rest solely on the nation state and that is the essence of the social contract that exists between a nation state and its citizens and it is on the basis of this social contract that a nation state acquires its sovereignty. In line with Hobbesian theory, at independence, Nigeria acquires its sovereign power in trust for its citizens to prevent a ‘state of nature – a constant state of conflict and war in the absence of a legally constituted government’ where life often become ‘’nasty, brutish, and short’’ aggravated by a sense of individual’s self-interest and fear. As opined by Nweke (1988), national security embodies the sovereignty of a nation state, the protection of its boundaries and the right of every citizen to be protected against any threat whether internal or external; and as enunciated by the United Nations in 2005, terrorism encompasses any act that is intended to cause death or serious bodily injuries to defenceless people or whatsoever is conceived for the purpose of intimidating or harassing non-combatant people or tailored towards compelling a government to perform a predetermined cause of action or abstain from doing what is legitimate.
That Nigeria remains the hotbed of the activities of terrorists, bandits, kidnappers, and a host of other criminal elements especially as it concerns the northern part of its vast landscape can not be controverted. In its 2025 report, the Global Terrorism Index (GTI) ranked Nigeria high among nations with the highest terrorism threat levels globally with a score of 7.658 as against 7.575 for 2024; which was equally bad. The GTI terrorism scale rank nations from 0 to 10 and it is a measure of both the direct and indirect effects of terrorism on each nation so indexed. A zero score indicates zero impact of terrorism while a score of 10 indicates the highest effect of terrorism. In 2025, Nigeria ranked sixth on the global stage and that is a statistical indication that terrorism still weighs heavily on Nigeria. Indeed, there has been an upsurge in the activities of terrorists, bandits and kidnappers within the territory of Nigeria lately. Elements of the set of Boko Haram (Western Education is forbidden as loosely translated by native Hausa speakers) keep attacking and killing civilians and security forces in the Northeast while those of the ISWAP set (Islamic State for West Africa Province), a splinter group of Boko Haram, keep pursuing their agenda of attacking and destroying both military and government assets in Nigeria’s Northeast according to the US Department of State’s Report on Terrorism for 2023. In Nigeria, bandits who are also known as kidnapping gangs refer to a group of criminal menfolk who hides in uninhabited forests and whose main motivation remains huge ransom payment as a quick means of amassing wealth when compared to their traditional and legal means of livelihood. The criminal activities of bandits in Nigeria keep spreading across the entire nation creating fear and weakening the earning capacity of many people leading to increase in the poverty levels of millions of households in the process.
The criminal activities of the different categories of the sets briefly listed above have reached a crescendo though the different criminal groups emerged at different times since 2009 when full-blown insurgency started in Borno State in Northeast Nigeria after the death of Mohammed Yusuf, the founder of the Boko Haram set. When Abubakar Shekau assumed the leadership of the Boko Haram set after the demise of Yusuf in government custody, the Boko Haram set became more deadly and fierce in their activities against the Nigerian nation and people of all religious orientations. At some points, the Abubakar Shekau’s group gained large swaths of land in the Northeast and they even appointed Emirs over some areas under their jurisdiction as at then. The soft targets of many of these criminals are schools, markets, places of worship like churches and mosques and remote villages with bad terrains.
Since 2014, more than 2000 children have been abducted from schools across the Northern part of Nigeria by various groups of criminal gangs including the Boko Haram set. Specifically, on the 14th of April 2014, some members of the Boko Haram set kidnapped 276 school girls from the Government Girls Secondary School in Chibok, Borno State while Goodluck Jonathan was the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. That incident jolted the consciousness of Nigerians and it raised alarm bells in international community because no incident of such scale has ever happened within the Nigerian state. More perplexing cases of abductions and kidnappings have since taken place in Nigeria. The following few examples of prior mass kidnappings should suffice to establish a background for this article because this article seek to introduce a new perspective to the debate on the effective means of countering insurgency in the Nigerian nation:
- On the 19th of February 2018, no fewer than 110 girls were abducted from the Government Girls’ Technical College in Dapchi, Yobe State in Northeast Nigeria. This was during the first tenure of Muhammadu Buhari as president. It was alleged then that a set of the Boko Haram Jihadists carried out the criminal activity.
- On the 11th of December 2020, more than 300 schoolboys were kidnapped from their school in the town of Kankara in the Northwest Nigeria by a criminal gang not directly linked to Boko Haram. This was during the second tenure of the Muhammadu Buhari as president.
- On the 17th November 2025, 25 school girls were kidnapped from Government Girls Comprehensive Secondary School in Maga town in Kebbi State. They were all eventually rescued about a week later.
- On the 21st November 2025, the kidnapping of 315 people was reported – 303 school children and 12 teachers by bandits from St. Mary Catholic Primary and Secondary schools in Papiri, a remote part of Agwara Local Government Area of Niger State. The criminal elements stormed the boarding school at about 2am on motorcycles and operated within the school dormitories for three hours. Of the total abductees, 50 of the school children escaped from the captors within the first day of the incident and they have since been reunited with their loved ones. Another set of 100 students were rescued by government forces and reunited with their families on the 7th of December 2025. The remaining 165 people including all the 12 teachers remain with the kidnappers.
- In the evening of Tuesday 18th November 2025, there was a disruption of a thanksgiving church service and at least two people were killed and 38 worshipers were kidnapped from a Christ Apostolic Church (CAC) in Eruku, Kwara State in North Central Nigeria.
Issues of kidnapping remain intractable in Nigeria and the rewards that accrues to the criminal elements that perpetuate kidnapping is huge. According to the evidence available to the international community, incidents of abduction and kidnappings rose sharply between July 2022 and June 2023 when 3620 cases were reported. The demand of the criminal elements for ransom payment within this period amounted to 5 billion Naira, an approximate value of $6.4 million in US dollar terms. The confirmed payments totaled 302 million Naira which amounted to $387, 179 US dollars (US International Trade Administration, Safety and Security, September 2025).
- The Perceived Root Causes of the Persistent and Intractable Violent Crimes across Nigeria
The reasons or roots of this current phase are multifaceted. Some attribute the terrorism that started in 2009 and persists to date to external sponsors, while others feel that most of the sponsors are within the country. The truth might have to do with a nuanced combination of the above two scenarios. Nevertheless, there are certain internal necessary conditions that allowed the insecurities to be born and to prosper. For example, our borders have been porous since independence, and this has allowed armed militants, bandits, and arms to flow from the Sahelian region of Africa to West Africa, especially Nigeria. There is widespread unemployment in the country, especially among the youth. The economy of the country has been depressed for many years and people should wonder that whereas Nigeria was at the same level or even ahead of countries like China, Singapore, South Korea, Vietnam, and Indonesia, and Malaysia in the 1960s and even 1970s, many of these nations are now far ahead of Nigeria in development and stability. .
A painstaking and thorough research on the subject matter of persistent insurgency in Nigeria since 2009 reveals the following as the main predisposing conditions of insecurity in the Nigerian nation:
(i). Trends of Persistent abject Poverty in Nigeria
(ii). Farmers vs. Herders Persistent Conflicts: Population explosion leading to more competition for limited natural resources
(iii). Porous Borders that Paved the Way for influx of tons of Illegal Immigrants and Arms Proliferation
- Guiding Principles for a New Security Architecture
That the President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces – President Bola Tinubu – has swiftly declared a national security emergency with clear directives that all personnel of the Nigerian Police Force attached to VIPs must be withdrawn and redeployed to underserved areas is commendable. However, it is important to state that any new national security strategy must be grounded in clear principles such as the following ideas:
3.1. Intelligence-Led, Not Fear-Led
Operations of security personnel including all agencies saddled with the responsibility of securing the life and property of citizens must be based on accurate, actionable intelligence—not mass sweeps, collective punishment, or indiscriminate force.
3.2. Civilian Protection at the Core
Since safeguarding of life and property is the fundamental rights of every law abiding citizens of Nigeria, every action of the men and officers of all law enforcement agencies must be directed towards safeguarding civilian lives and rights. This builds legitimacy and weakens recruitment efforts of extremists.
3.3. Multi-Level Governance focused on Marked Improvement of the Life and Living of Citizens
Internal security is not a task for the federal government of Nigeria alone. States, local governments, traditional institutions, and communities do have and must activate their formally defined roles and all the above entities must work towards addressing conditions that predispose people toward embracing any act of violence of whatever form.
Authorities of all Local Governments across Nigeria must rise to the task of being the closet government to the people at the grassroots with actionable plans that brings a sense of belonging to the people within their jurisdictions. In July 2024, the Supreme Court of Nigeria made an important declaration that funds that accrues to each Local Government from the Federation Account on a monthly basis must be paid directly to them thereby ending decades of obnoxious and illegal practice of state governments in controlling funds meant for local governments and thereby withholding huge amount of money intended for the development of the grassroots. More than a year after that Supreme Court judgement, research shows its implementation has been hampered by many bureaucratic and political hurdles created wittingly by governors. Such a laudable pronouncement by the highest court in Nigeria should have been implemented in a jiffy for better service delivery at the grassroots.
As a Nigerian with international exposures, I am deeply pained that governors who themselves are enlightened and also know what is obtainable in other climes would deliberately make simple things rather difficult not minding the fatal consequences of their refusal to abide by the verdict of the supreme court on the polity and on good governance.
I am aware that the idea of the Local Government Administration was introduced into Nigeria before independence with the enactment of the Native Authority Ordinance 1910 (Ogbuene, 2011; & Cyriacus et al., 2024). After independence, further measures were taken in 1976 to strengthen local government administration in Nigeria when the document called the Guidelines for Local Government Reforms was released by the Federal Government. The document outlines the structure and functions of Local Government as the third tier of governance in Nigeria. The present Local Government system derives its relevance from the 1976 LG guidelines and it is an initiative that is capable of repositioning Nigeria for growth and development in line with national developmental objectives and I vehemently urged all state governors and chairmen of all the 774 existing local governments to strive to work towards the success of the third tier of government in Nigeria so that the people at the grassroots can start to reap the benefits of democracy and good governance leading to a peaceful coexistence of all and sundry irrespective of religious or ethnic differences within same community across the length and breadth of our great nation.
3.4. There is the need for Regional Interdependence
There is no doubt that insecurity in Nigeria is a spill over effect of instability in the neighbouring countries of Niger, Chad, Cameroon, and the broader Sahel. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that no permanent solution to the problem of persistent insurgency is possible without regional cooperation.
The Lake Chad Basin remains a particular concern to Nigeria. The locality is a global breeding ground for terrorism and the jihadists like Boko Haram and ISWAP have exploited the terrain for long to their advantage. Research shows that because of a combination of many factors such as porous borders, presence of swamps and islands without any defined governance structure, and weak government presence, the Lake Chad Basin provides safe havens for many criminal elements and blood thirsty jihadists. High fatalities caused by violent extremists abound at the Lake Chad Basin and the criminal elements from there easily creep into Nigeria through the many porous borders to commit heinous crimes and retired back to base unnoticed.
There have been efforts on the part of the governments of Nigeria, Chad, Niger and Cameroon with international support from the United Nations, but more needs to be done with a focus on stabilization in the region, and reintegration cum rehabilitation of the inhabitants to achieve lasting peace within the basin and in the four nations that borders it including our great country, Nigeria.
3.5. Government at all levels in Nigeria Must Address the Root Causes of Insurgency and Violent Crimes
Youth unemployment, poor governance, corruption, and social neglect fuel insecurity. These must be addressed alongside kinetic operations being implemented by the Nigerian armed forces and other security agencies.
- 4. Intelligence-Led Security Operations: The Strategic Pivot Nigeria Must Make
4.1 Create a National Counter-Insurgency & Intelligence Fusion Centre
I submit that Nigeria needs a dedicated institution that integrates intelligence from all agencies of government such as the armed forces, the police intelligence, the Directorate of State Services (DSS), the immigration and the customs including the EFCC and the ICPC (Nigeria’s core anti-corruption agencies). I also posit that state-level intelligence units and informants from communities across the nation should be incorporated into a body that should be known as National Counter-insurgency and Intelligence Fusion Centre.
The responsibility of the Fusion Centre must include: 1. Tracking terrorist cells, their financiers, and logistics. 2. Capacity building to deplore geospatial mapping (satellite, UAVs like drones-used to collect aerial data, such as high-resolution images, LIDAR scans, or multi-spectral data, that can be processed to produce 3D models, and other geospatial information and sensors). 3. Coordinate inter-agency operations 4. Maintain a unified national threat database 5. Liaise with regional and international intelligence bodies
It is important that this centre should maintain; 1. Parliamentary and judicial oversight. 2. Strict data protection rules. 3. Multi-agency staffing. 4. Transparent budget audits
4.2 Precision Operations of Our Vast Land Mass over Large-Scale Clearing
Whereas Nigeria has many ungoverned spaces and forests due to the large expanse of land of the country, the idea of clearing forests such as Sambisa to reduce insurgency is counterproductive, environmentally catastrophic, and militarily inefficient. Sambisa is roughly 518 squared kilometers —large, but not insurmountable through modern surveillance. A smarter approach involves the following; 1. The use of Long-endurance drone patrols. 2. Infrared and night-vision surveillance. 3. Tracking logistic routes rather than empty terrain. 4. Small, mobile special forces units with forest warfare training. 5. Collaboration with vetted local scouts. Overall, the strategies outlined above are cheaper, more sustainable, and far more effective than mass deforestation.
- 5. Reforming Policing: Federal–State Layered Policing with Strong Oversight
Nigeria’s overcentralised policing model is structurally incapable of dealing with widespread criminality. A layered model is essential.
5.1 Establish Constitutionally Backed State Police Systems
Not ad-hoc militias such as vigilantes. While research shows that in ‘’alternatively governed spaces’’ where the presence of the state is less obvious, vigilantes do have their roles as vacuum-fillers in counter-terrorism and in maintaining the internal security of a nation as vast in landscape as Nigeria as enunciated by Ajala and Murphy (2025), the proposed state police systems should be well-trained and equipped police forces. Persons that would be enlisted into the state police must undergo and pass background checks. Each unit of state police must be regulated nationally, equipped with forensic and digital skills and tools for effectiveness. All personnel of the state police units must be integrated into a national security database.
Considering the peculiarity of the Nigerian state, a phased implementation of the state police system is recommended. Perhaps, a pilot implementation could start in 6 (six) states. Constant evaluation should be the focus from onset. A maximum of twenty (24) months should be regarded as the period of evaluation. A nation-wide adoption should be considered afterwards with lessons learnt considered when the time comes for a full nation-wide adoption.
As stated earlier, though it is controversial, but no evidence-based facts should be discountenanced in an issue with grave consequences as countering insurgency and criminal elements, vigilantes (as non-state actors) do have a role to play in places with less government visibility such as many areas within the Lake Chad Basin as established via well-researched empirical studies such as Alozieuwa (2021), Ashindorbe et. al. (2021), Monday & Okpanachi (2021) and Ajala & Murphy (2025), but this should not be misplaced for a functional and well-trained state police.
5.2 Strengthen the Federal Police
Once State Police comes into operation, to handle and ensure the stability of the fight against terrorism, it is important that the Federal Police should be saddled with more specific duties such as the investigation of serious organised crimes, trafficking networks, cybercrimes, and forensics & intelligence analysis.
The Federal Police must become more specialised and less burdened by grassroots policing.
5.3 Create a National Police Standards & Oversight Commission
The creation of a body to be known as a National Police Standards and Oversight Commission becomes imperative once State Police and the Federal Police have assumed their specialised and assigned duties. This should be a civilian-led body with power to set standards, investigate abuses, certify state police, and audit training, budgets, and general operations from time to time.
- 6. Community Security Architecture: Formalising and Regulating Local Protection
Local vigilante groups already operate in many states. Ignoring them is dangerous; banning them is unrealistic. The solution is professionalisation and regulation.
6.1 The Community Security Integration Programme
The place of a Community Security Integration System is very important in the new security architecture for Nigeria. This framework would be to register and vet vigilante members, provide basic training (non-lethal tactics, rights protection, and methods of de-escalation), provide communication tools for reporting to state police, issue ID cards, uniforms, and codes of conduct. The body can also be saddled with the responsibility of paying stipends, and arranging insurance, and legal protections for valid members.
6.2 Boundaries
Community groups such as vigilantes at the borders must NOT be involved with any of the following acts or duties: 1. handling any type of assault weapons 2. Conduct independent operations 3. Run detention facilities 4. Conduct prosecutions
Their roles must strictly be intelligence gathering, providing early warning signals, escorting local transport, and where necessary, provide support during covert and overt investigations within the local community.
- 7. Starving the Criminal Networks: Financial Tracking, Arms Control, and Logistics Denial
7.1 Establish a Unified Anti-Terror Finance & Illicit Trafficking Unit
Establising a unified and and anti-terror finance and illicit trafficking unit as a part of concerted efforts to rein in terrorists and criminal elements in Nigeria to achieve lasting peace is very important. Under EFCC/CBN/DSS collaboration, the following could be achieved: 1. track bank transfers, hawala networks, digital currencies. 2. Identify sponsors, including political or business actors. 3. Trace procurement chains for arms and supplies. 4. Use asset forfeiture aggressively.
7.2 Equip Customs and Immigration with Modern Tools
The customs and immigration have aggressive roles to play in support of a new security architecture. These roles include: 1 Digital manifest systems. 2. Use of scanners. 3. Use of GPS tracking for cargo. 4. Joint operations with police and DSS. 5. Accountability for corrupt officers. This involves the need to make corrupt officers to account for their misdeeds.
7.3 Launch a National Arms Amnesty plus Buyback Program
Since heavy proliferation of small arms and assault weapons are rife in Nigeria, there is the need to launch a national arms amnesty which should include an option of possible arms buyback. This idea should be paired with: strict arms licensing reforms, marking and tracing of weapons, harsh penalties for trafficking and illegal possession of fire arms.
- 8. Border Security: Smart, Layered, and Regionally Coordinated—Not Continuous Fencing
While Nigeria cannot fence over 4,000 km of border posts, it can at least secure the most important crossing points. There is, therefore, the need to put forward the following ideas:
8.1 The Integrated Border Management (IBM) Model
This is a novel idea that I think is worth embracing or adopting. The Integrated Border Management (IBM) should combine modern surveillance, border community development, joint patrols, biometric entry/exit systems, intelligence sharing, and rapid response units.
8.2 Create Joint Border Command Centres
In order to address the complexity of areas like the Lake Chad Basin, there is the need to create shared security facilities with Niger, Chad, and Cameroon for joint operations, real-time intelligence sharing, extradition protocols, and surveillance coordination.
8.3 Invest in Border Communities
While it may sound odd considering the paucity of funds for other critical projects in areas more densely populated than some border towns and villages with far less population, it does make a lot of security sense to invest in communities along Nigeria’s borders starting with border posts where people are more inclined to embracing radical religious and or criminal ideas. Such investment should include roads, health care facilities, schools, markets, irrigation projects where necessary, and visible security outposts. Without any iota of doubt, such investment is capable of creating local resistance to militants and strengthens or cement understanding and cooperation with authorities.
- 9. Reducing Recruitment: Jobs, Education, and Rehabilitation
9.1 Jobs and Income: The Most Powerful Prevention Tool
Nigeria should launch a mass employment and livelihood programme in vulnerable regions starting with: 1. cash-for-work schemes. This is where locals are employed and paid to carry out specific task within the community in furtherance of the welfare of the community.
9.2. Road and irrigation projects. Locals can be employed to build their own roads under the guidance of the officials of the appropriate government agency in the area.
9.3. Reforestation. Planting of trees to reduce the effect of climate change is a good measure in places where desert encroachment is becoming obvious and locals in the specific areas can be hired to carry out this simple task.
9.4. School renovation projects. Locals can also be employed to renovate schools within that community rather than awarding the contract to someone who would bring workers from afar.
Other ideas that might improve the livelihood of people and reduce poverty and, hence, overcoming the temptation of being a willing tool for recruiters of terror supporters is improvement of market infrastructure, and provision of portable water systems. One important and incontestible fact is that immediate income weakens the appeal of insurgents’ “salary” promises.
9.5. Vocational and Skills Education
The move by government in recent months towards vocational and technical skills is laudable. Federal government now pays young people monthly stipends to learn vocational and technical skills that is right for them. A further step up the ladder of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) programme of the Federal Government is by creating Conflict State Vocational Hubs that focuses on such skill acquisitions as solar installation, mobile phone repairs, agriculture and farm mechanisation, logistics and trucking, digital skills acquisition, and acquisition of skills within the construction trade.
9.6. Deradicalisation, Rehabilitation & Reintegration
A humane, community-accepted process must be established for low-level fighters, captives returning from insurgent camps, and radicalised youths wanting to exit.
This must include psychological support, literacy and vocational skills, continued mentorship, community reconciliation processes, and monitoring to reduce recidivism.
- 10. Governance, Anti-Corruption, and Oversight Reforms
10.1 Create a National Security Oversight Commission
The National security Oversight Commission is conceptualised as a statutory body (with civil society representation) to audit operations, review budgets, monitor human-rights compliance, hold public hearings, and recommend reforms.
10.2 Create a Security Procurement Transparency Initiative
Comparable to NEITI in the extractive sector.
10.3 Mandate State-Level Security Accountability Offices
Each state should have a public Security Ombudsman to investigate abuses, handle citizen complaints, and publish quarterly reports.
- 11. Regional and International Cooperation
Nigeria must lead—again—on regional security coordination.
11.1 Revitalise Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) Operations
Improve joint funding, shared intelligence, coordinated offensives, and hot pursuit agreements.
11.2 Strengthen ECOWAS and AU Security Mechanisms
Even with regional political shifts, Nigeria must build bilateral pacts, cross-border information-sharing, and joint border development programs
- 12. Strategic Communications and Counter-Narratives
A war of ideas must complement the war of arms to balance kinetic and non-kinetic approach to counterterrorism. In this regard, Nigeria needs to stage media literacy campaigns, youth-targeted counter-recruitment messaging, community radio programs, religious leader partnership networks, and rapid rumor-control teams
- 13. Implementation Roadmap (2025–2030)
As a guide to the implementation roadmap, the following phases are suggested for the ideas already put forward in this white paper:
Phase 1 (2025–2026): Steps for quick Wins are: 1. Establish Fusion Centre 2. Pilot state police 3. Register community security groups 4. Launch border command centres 5. Start cash-for-work programs 6. Deploy drones and surveillance 7. Begin terrorism-finance crackdown
Phase 2 (2026–2028): For the purpose of expansion, the following ideas already discussed could be adopted: 1. Scale state police 2. Fully implement IBM model 3. National vocational hubs 4. Expand deradicalisation centres 5. Introduce security procurement transparency reforms
Phase 3 (2028–2030): For the purpose of consolidation to ensure continued peaceful coexistence of people in their different localities across Nigeria, Phase 3 becomes necessary for implementation and the key issues already discussed and that falls due for Phase 3 implementation are: 1. Regional border markets 2. Full integration of policing databases 3. National community policing model 4. Continuous counter-narrative programming
- 14. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
As it is for all worthwhile programmes, it is important to monitor and evaluate the entire framework by the use of the following key metrics:
- Periodic assessment to determine whether there is a reduction in terror/bandit attack fatalities
- Periodic assessment to determine whether there is a decrease in kidnappings and records of ransom
- Assessment of the number of arrests and prosecutions of culprits and financiers
- Assessment of the number of youth employment uptake
- A periodic assessment of the level of trust of the people at each flashpoint by way of conducting periodic community trust surveys
- A regular assessment of the level of arms and assault weapons collected from surrendered terrorists and bandits by way of keeping an up to date statistics of weapon seizure and tracing
- A review of border interception data to determine the effectiveness of the implemented strategies for border posts.
- 15. Conclusion: A Pathway to a Secure and Prosperous Nigeria
Nigeria can overcome this prolonged phase of insecurity but not through a force of arms and ammunition alone. The path forward lies in a holistic, well-coordinated strategy that aligns intelligence, security forces, cooperation of people in communities, well-thought out economic policies, deliberate focus on youth empowerment, governance reforms that aims at eradicating the root causes of terrorism and banditry, and effective and mutually beneficial regional diplomacy.
This white paper presents an actionable, realistic roadmap for restoring stability. With political will, institutional integrity, and societal participation, Nigeria can reclaim its security, rebuild public trust, and unlock its enormous economic and human potential.
References:
- Kelvin Ashindorbe, Fortune Afatakpa and Saheed B Owonikoko, “Civilian Joint TaskForce and Nigeria’s Counter Terrorism Operation: A Critique of the Community-BasedApproach to Insecurity,” African Security 14, no. 3: 286–305, https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2021.1998977
- Olayinka Ajala and Joe Murphy (2025), Countering Terrorism in Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin: Reassessing the Role of Vigilantism as a Counter-terrorism Initiative. Journal of African Security, 2025, Vol. 18, No 1, 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2025.2458409 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/19392206.2025.2458409?needAccess=true
- Nweke, G. A. (1988), “Some Critical Remarks on the National Security Question”, Nigerian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 12
- The US International Trade Administration, Safety and Security, 08-09-2025. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/nigeria-safety-and-security
- US Department of State’s Report of Terrorism in Nigeria for 2022. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2022/nigeria
- US Department of State’s Report of Terrorism in Nigeria for 2023. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2023/nigeria/
- Global Terrorism Index (GTI) for 2024
- Global Terrorism Index for 2025
- Aina Monday and Odiji Okpanachi (2019), “Role of Vigilante Groups in War Against Terrorism in North Eastern Nigeria,” Global Journal of Politics and Law Research 7, no. 2: 49–58, org/journals/global-journal-of-politics-and-law-research-gjplr/vol-7-issue-2-february-2019/role-of-vigilante-groups-in-war-against-terrorism-in-north-eastern-nigeria/
- Simeon Alozieuwa (2021), “Review of the Evolution of the Civilian Joint Task Force,” African Journal of Terrorism and Insurgency Research 2, no. 3 75–119. https://doi.org/10.31920/2732-5008/2021/v2n3a4
